Search Clay Mathematics Institute

  • About
    About
    • About
    • History
    • Principal Activities
    • Who’s Who
    • CMI Logo
    • Policies
  • Programs & Awards
    Programs & Awards
    • Programs & Awards
    • Funded programs
    • Fellowship Nominations
    • Clay Research Award
    • Dissemination Award
  • People
  • The Millennium Prize Problems
    The Millennium Prize Problems
    • The Millennium Prize Problems
    • Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture
    • Hodge Conjecture
    • Navier-Stokes Equation
    • P vs NP
    • Poincaré Conjecture
    • Riemann Hypothesis
    • Yang-Mills & the Mass Gap
    • Rules for the Millennium Prize Problems
  • Online resources
    Online resources
    • Online resources
    • Books
    • Video Library
    • Lecture notes
    • Collections
      Collections
      • Collections
      • Euclid’s Elements
      • Ada Lovelace’s Mathematical Papers
      • Collected Works of James G. Arthur
      • Klein Protokolle
      • Notes of the talks at the I.M.Gelfand Seminar
      • Quillen Notebooks
      • Riemann’s 1859 Manuscript
  • Events
  • News

Home — Lectures — 3-manifolds after Perelman: topology, geometry, and effective rigidity

3-manifolds after Perelman: topology, geometry, and effective rigidity

Our understanding of 3-manifolds has advanced considerably since Perelman’s proof of Thurston’s Geometrization Conjecture, with many original approaches to the conjecture becoming new exciting theorems in their own right. In the hyperbolic setting, however, determining precisely how a topological description of a 3-manifold determines its geometry has remained a central challenge. I’ll review examples and describe some progress toward elucidating geometric information.

Share
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact CMI

© 2025 Clay Mathematics Institute

Site by One