Folios 48- 49, 163-165:
AAL to ADM
Ashley
Sundy 13th Sepr
[1840] [added in pencil by later reader]
Dear Mr De Morgan
I am very much
obliged by your remarks &
additions. I believe I now
understand as much of the
points in question as I am
intended to understand at
present. I am much inclined
to agree with the paragraph
in page 48; for though
the conclusions must be
[48v] admitted to be most perfectly
correct & indisputable, logically
speaking, yet there is a
something intangible & a
little unsatisfactory too, about
the proposition.
I expect to gain a good
deal of new light, & to get
a good lift, in studying
from page 52 to 58;
though probably I shall be
a long time about this. I
could wish I went on
quicker. That is I wish
a human head, or my head
at all events, could take in
[49r] a great deal more & a great
deal more rapidly than is the
case; and if I had made
my own head, I would
have proportioned it's [sic] wishes
& ambition a little more to
it's [sic] capacity. When I sit
down to study, I generally
feel as if I could never
be tired; as if I could
go on for ever. I say
to myself constantly, ''Now today
I will get through so & so'';
and it is very disappointing
to find oneself after an
hour or two quite wearied,
& having accomplished perhaps
[49v] about one twentieth part of
one's intentions, perhaps not
that. When I compare
the very little I do, with the
very much the infinite I
may say that there is to
be done; I can only
hope that hereafter in some
future state, we shall be
cleverer than we are now.
I am
afraid I do not understand
what you were kind enough
to write about the Curve;
and I think for this reason,
that I do not know what
[164r] the term equation to a curve
means. Probably with some
study, I should deduce that
meaning myself; but having
plenty else to attend to of
more immediate consequence,
I do not like to give my
time to a mere digression
of this sort. I should
much like at some future
period, (when I have got
rid of the common Algebra
& Trigonometry which at
present detain me), to
attend particularly to this
subject. At present, you
[164v] will observe I have four
distinct things to [something crossed out]
carry on at the same
time; the Algebra;
Trigonometry; Chapter 2nd of the
Differential Calculus; & the
mere practice in Differentiation.
This last reminds me
that my bookseller has at
last & with much difficulty
got me Peacock's Book; &
I hope it will be of
great use, for it's [sic] cost is
£2..12..6 ! It was
originally 30s. It is
[163r] coming here next week.
By the bye I have a
question to ask upon pages
203 & 204 of the Algebra.
In consequence of a reference
to page 203, in the 9th line
of the 25th page of the
Trigonometry, I was induced
to look & see what it
related to. Reading on
afterwards to the bottom of
the page, I found
''A f u n c t i o n a l e q u a t i o n is an
''equation which is necessarily
''true of a function or functions
''for every value of the letter
''which it contains. Thus if,
[163v] ''\( \varphi x=ax\), we have \(\varphi(bx)=\)
''\( abx=b\times\varphi x\), or
''\( \varphi(bx)=b\varphi x\) ''
''is always true when \(\varphi x\)
''means \(ax\) .''
So far I think is clear;
but then what follows,
''Thus &c
\[\begin{array}{lll}``\text{If} & \varphi x=x^\alpha & \varphi\alpha\times\varphi y=\varphi(\alpha y)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\\ ``&\varphi =a^x \ldots & \varphi x\times\varphi y=\varphi(x+y)\\ ``&\varphi x=ax+b \ldots & \displaystyle{\frac{\varphi x-\varphi y}{\varphi x-\varphi z}=\frac{x-y}{x-z}}\\ ``&\varphi x=ax &\varphi x+\varphi y=\varphi(x+y))\end{array}\]
I cannot trace the
connection. I suppose there is
something I have not
understood, in the explanation
of the Functional Equation.
[165r] I hope before very long to
have something further to
send you upon Chapter 2nd
of the Calculus, either of
success or of enquiry.
Has Mrs De Morgan returned
yet, & how is Mr Frend?
With many thanks,
Yours very truly
A. A. Lovelace
About this document
All Ada Lovelace manuscript images on the
Clay Mathematics Institute website are
© 2015 The Lovelace Byron Papers,
reproduced by permission of
Pollinger Limited. To re-use them in
any form, please apply to
katyloffman@pollingerltd.com.
The LaTeX transcripts of the letters
were made by Christopher Hollings
(christopher.hollings@maths.ox.ac.uk).
Their re-use in any form requires his
permission, and is subject to the
rights reserved to the owner of
The Lovelace Byron Papers.
Bodleian Library, Oxford, UK
Dep. Lovelace Byron